Press Coverage
May 19, 2003
U.S. pushes for wider seat
belt use
75% usage rate
in the U.S. is lower than most of the developed world by
Jayne O'Donnell
USA TODAY
BOSTON — Kevin O'Connor, a spinal-cord
doctor who teaches people how to use wheelchairs and control
their
bowels and
bladder, has an unofficial specialty: car-crash victims,
the ones who don't wear seat belts.
Before he came to Boston's
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
last year, O'Connor worked in San Diego, where it was rare
to see teens lying in traction after flying out of their
cars and trucks. But now, he regularly treats people whose
lives
changed forever when crashes stopped their cars — and
they kept going.
That's because only about half of Massachusetts
motorists wear safety belts, and a greater percentage die
unbelted
than in
any state but Rhode Island. In both states, three-fourths
of those who die in car crashes are unbelted, a USA TODAY
analysis
shows.
Cars have had seat belts for more than 30 years,
and states started requiring their use in 1984. But the risk
of debilitating
injury or death — or a ticket — has persuaded
only 75% of Americans to buckle up. That gives the USA
a lower rate
than most of the developed world. Federal officials say
if everyone wore belts, it would prevent up to a third — about
9,200 — of the 31,000 deaths in car and truck crashes
each year.
Congestion, which slows traffic, helps Massachusetts
maintain the country's lowest overall highway death toll.
But the
consequences of having the lowest seat-belt usage rate
in the USA and one
of the highest crash rates are seen in rehab hospitals
across the state.
"
You never think something like this could happen to you," says
Michael Prestipino of Lowell, Mass., a quadriplegic since
his unbelted body was ejected from his pickup on an icy road
last
year.
Federal and state officials share the $26 billion
annual cost of Medicaid to care for unbelted drivers and
cover
their lost
productivity. Still, states vary on the degree of importance
they place on getting people to buckle up.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is
spearheading a massive two-week drive through Memorial
Day to fire up
the states to promote safety-belt use and encourage
police officers
to ticket the unbelted. The focus is on Memorial Day
because it kicks off summer, the deadliest season on
the road.
NHTSA wants to achieve 78% usage this year.
The usage
rate hasn't budged more than a few percentage points in
the last decade, but it isn't for lack of
trying. Federal
officials encourage, cajole and threaten states to
get them to pass laws that let police ticket unbelted
motorists.
Now,
NHTSA wants Congress to let it force states to pass
tougher belt laws or be required to spend highway construction
money on highway safety.
NHTSA says data overwhelmingly
show that the only way to make major strides in belt usage
is education, coupled
with strong
police enforcement of so-called primary belt laws.
These laws allow police to pull people over simply
because
they
are not
wearing seat belts. Federal data show that states
passing these laws can expect an 8-percentage-point increase
in usage. Still,
although almost every state allows police to stop
cars
if young children aren't in child seats, only 19
states have
primary
belt-use laws.
Automakers and insurers also lobby
for primary laws because seat-belt usage can save them money.
Automakers
are sued
less because belts reduce injuries that might otherwise
be attributed
to the car, and insurers pay fewer and lower personal-injury
claims. North Carolina insurance data show that
drivers there have saved $132 million in premiums since its
seat-belt usage
jumped from 65% in 1993 to 84% in '95.
Higher belt
use would also boost states' bottom lines. Massachusetts
pays nearly $40 million a
year to care
for head- and spinal
cord-injury patients who were unbelted, according
to a new study for the Air Bag & Seat Belt
Safety Campaign, funded by the auto and insurance
industries. That's almost six times
what Virginia, with 70% belt use, pays.
Why people
don't wear belts
Working against high belt use:
• Apathy – When
there's no Ford, Firestone or drunk driver to blame, there's
little public outrage about car crash deaths.
Americans have grown used to losing almost
as many people every year in crashes as were lost during
the entire Vietnam War.
Although more people under 60 now
die from injuries in car crashes than from injuries
from any other
cause, other misfortunes — breast
cancer, heart disease and AIDS — have
been far more effective rallying points for
fundraising and lobbying.
• Civil
libertarians – Laws
in several states have been blocked or stymied by those
who oppose government intrusion
in citizens' lives. In Massachusetts, a now-deceased radio talk-show host
almost single-handedly won two repeals of laws
requiring belt use in 1986 and 1993, and his efforts echo in the current debate
about whether police should be able to pull
over the unbelted.
"There's some bizarre equating of not wearing a seat belt
with being a red-blooded American," says emergency room physician
Richard Herman of Brockton (Mass.) Hospital. "Intellectually,
you could almost understand the argument, but
these are kids being killed. Aren't these people
parents?"
Massachusetts Republican State Rep. Brad Jones,
who opposes a primary belt law although he
wears a seat
belt, doesn't
find it so strange. "At what point is the impact of saving
one life worth the trade-off in civil liberties?" he asks.
He says there is a "mistrust of authority" in
his state dating to the Boston Tea Party.
• Racial
profiling – Concerns that belt laws
will encourage police to unfairly target minority
drivers have stalled
or helped defeat primary belt laws in several states. African-American
state legislators in Virginia cited these concerns
in voting against a proposed primary law there this year.
• Misinformation – Many people who don't buckle up
perpetuate what can be half truths about the dangers
of
seat belts. Cases in which people have been seriously injured
or killed because
they were wearing a belt are so rare that many
doctors say they've never seen them. And although there
are horrific crashes
where the belts' estimated 50% effectiveness
will not save you, medical experts say the benefits greatly
outweigh the
risks.
Herman says that any accident that had
enough force to cause an internal injury from a seat
belt would
kill
the person
who wasn't belted.
Massachusetts has a so-called
secondary law that requires wearing a belt but doesn't allow
police
to pull motorists
over only
for that violation. The state has been slow
in enforcing the law and in advertising its belt-use
campaign.
But Massachusetts highway safety spokesman
Brook Chipman says that once the state started
to push
for usage
last November, the expected outrage never developed. "After
all the hesitancy we had, it was really encouraging," says
Chipman, who says the state should have started
sooner.
The state will tally its new usage rate
early next month. But the push has come too
late
for thousands
of motorists,
including
Prestipino. He says he was never told to wear
a belt when he was young, so he never developed
the
habit.
He was never
pulled
over for not wearing a belt and says he never
saw any public service messages about belts.
Children follow parents
Many who don't buckle
up say they're only putting themselves at risk. But Tim Hoyt,
safety
director at Nationwide
Insurance, says the children of adults
who don't buckle up are far
less likely to use seat belts themselves. NHTSA chief Jeffrey Runge, a former emergency
room physician, says those who don't use
seat belts
don't take into account
the emotional and economic toll placed on
families or the price paid by taxpayers and
insured
motorists.
Prestipino, who managed a paint
store before his January 2002 crash, says his family has
paid less
than $1,000
for his medical
care. The rest has been paid by insurance
and Medicaid. Treatment for severe spinal-cord
injuries such
as Prestipino's average
up to $400,000 the first year and $40,000
a
year after, helping explain why Massachusetts'
auto
insurance rates
are the third-highest
in the USA.
Prestipino's wife, Diane, found
a teaching job recently to support her family, which
includes a toddler who
was 5 months
old when her husband was injured. She
has to get up two hours early to get her husband,
who
has
regained some
use of his
hands, and daughter ready for their day.
Their
home has been redesigned — with
money from friends and relatives — to
accommodate Michael's wheelchair.
Among
O'Connor's patients at Spaulding Rehab,
Prestipino is one of the lucky
ones. Some
have brain injuries
along with
their paralyzed bodies. Sometimes it
takes some convincing for them to realize
they
are lucky
to be alive. "They
go through a grieving process similar
to when someone dies," O'Connor
says. "Then they resolve things
in their head .... and say 'I want to
do the most I can
do.' "
Massachusetts state Sen.
Brian Lees, a Republican, has sponsored
primary belt
legislation twice
and is fighting
the battle
again this summer. "Life-and-death
issues don't come before the legislature
very often," says Lees, who often
gets hate mail because of his position. "I
try not to just look at things in political
terms.
I think I'm going to win
on this some day."
Larry Gentilello,
trauma chief at Boston's Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center,
hopes so.
"Every day, I'm faced with speaking to a
mother or a father whose young adult is in a coma," Gentilello
says. "I
think, 'Why didn't you educate your child
about wearing seat belts?' They are experiencing
the
tragedy of their lives. You
look in their eyes, and you realize they're
not there anymore." Contributing:
Barbara Hansen |